![]() ![]() The golden rule argument in its most classic sense is in fact barred, but virtually every golden rule motion in limine you will encounter purports to prohibit a broader class of conduct than is actually disallowed under Georgia law. Given the ubiquity of these motions, you might be inclined to think that golden rule arguments are in fact prohibited in Georgia courts. Let’s start with a motion in limine included in virtually every set defense attorneys in Georgia file: a prohibition on so-called Golden Rule arguments, in which a trial attorney asks the jury to place themselves in the plaintiff’s shoes. Has Kastorf Law not yet addressed the motion in limine you’re struggling with? Have follow up questions? Would you rather just have someone else handle the whole thing? We do that. Check out how to respond to reptile theory motions in limine. We’ll now be running individual articles covering some of the most common motions in limine Georgia plaintiffs’ attorneys should expect to encounter. Part II addressed how to engage in triage when you’ve received a stack of motions in limine. Part I of that series is series covered advance preparation for a deluge of motions in limine. ![]() ![]() How should you respond to golden rule motions in limine? In Motions in Limine: The Complete Guide, Kastorf Law proposed a complete plan for trial lawyers responding to motions in limine. What is the best response to a motion in limine to prohibit “golden rule” arguments in Georgia? ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |